Switch to an accessible version of this website which is easier to read. (requires cookies)

Home Office chaos continues - Brooke

July 24, 2006 12:14 PM

Annette Brooke MP, Member of the Committee of Public Accounts, said today:

"The Home Office has a substantial back catalogue of examples of poor management and stumbling projects, but it has crowned it with two astonishing failures. It has failed in its obligation to present to Parliament properly audited financial accounts. And, secondly, it has failed in its duty to protect the public - by releasing from prison a large number of foreign nationals, many imprisoned for ghastly offences, without giving any consideration to whether they should be deported.

"The significance of these failures can hardly be overstated. Together they constitute a severe indictment of the way in which the Home Office has been run and demonstrate the inability of its leadership to act in a unified and coordinated way on its fundamental responsibilities - and perhaps even to understand them properly.

"The manager of even the smallest corner shop knows how crucial it is to reconcile cash records with bank statements. And there can be few people in the country who would contemplate allowing convicted foreign criminals to disappear back on to the streets of the UK, without thought being given to what this might mean for public safety.

"The public's confidence in the Home Office has been badly damaged. The new Accounting Officer and his team have a long road to travel to restore that confidence. I will be watching closely to see whether the reform programme announced this week by the Home Secretary does succeed in taking his department any way along that road."

Annette was speaking as the Committee published its 60th Report of this Session.

ENDS

Notes to Editors:

60th Report: Home Office Resource Accounts 2004-05 and Follow-Up on Returning Failed Asylum Applicants (HC 1079)

The C&AG reported to Parliament on 31 January 2006 that he had disclaimed his opinion on the Home Office's Resource Accounts for 2004-05 because the Department was unable to submit its accounts in time for the audit to be completed to the statutory timetable. Furthermore, his examination was severely limited because the Home Office had not maintained proper books and records which would have enabled it to disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Department.

The Home Office encountered considerable problems during the implementation of its new financial accounting system, which significantly impacted on the ability of the Department to produce timely financial statements. A lack of senior management oversight, which would have enabled problems to be addressed as they arose, then compounded matters.

On the day before our hearing, the Home Office issued a letter of apology to the Committee in respect of incorrect information they had previously given to the Committee on the number of foreign national prisoners released from custody without consideration for deportation.

The Home Office does not have a grip on the issue of foreign nationals released from prison and not deported, and was unable to provide full information to the Committee about the numbers or locations of such offenders. It could not provide any assurance that foreign nationals are no longer being released from custody without consideration of deportation, or that definitive action is being taken to improve the situation. The Home Secretary's statement on 23 May set out the practical steps to improve the handling of foreign national prisoners, but his statement was also indicative of wider systemic failings affecting the whole Department which need to be addressed urgently.

The Home Office has consistently underestimated the problems that impact on its ability to meet its aims and objectives. The disclaimed opinion on the accounts, and the confusion and failure to consider deportation on release from custody of foreign national prisoners are symptoms of a deeper lack of leadership and co-ordination. Restoring public confidence in the Home Office's capacity to deliver the complex range of services for which it is responsible remains a major challenge for the new Accounting Officer and his senior management team.

What would you like to do next?

  • Subscribe for updates

    Read updates from this website in your desktop or online news reader

    • On a news reader website

      •  
      •  
      •  

      In a desktop news reader or a website not listed above

      •  
    • Example monthly digest email
      •  
      •  
      •  
    • If you submit your contact details, Annette Brooke MP, the Liberal Democrats, and their elected representatives may use the information you provide to contact you about issues you may find of interest. Some of the contacts may be automated. You can opt out of these contacts at any time by contacting us.


    • Generate different image

    Join our email list

    • If you submit your contact details, Annette Brooke MP, the Liberal Democrats, and their elected representatives may use the information you provide to contact you about issues you may find of interest. Some of the contacts may be automated. You can opt out of these contacts at any time by contacting us.


    • Generate different image

    Follow the party's activity on...

  • Share this page

    Share this page on another website

    Link to this page

    On websites and printed material:
    middorsetlibdems.org.uk/en/article/2006/078267/home-office-chaos-continues-brooke
    In text messages, Twitter, or reading over the phone:
    annettebrooke.co.uk/a73m2

    Email this page to a friend


    • Generate different image
  • Help out or donate

    Help out in your local area

      •  
      •  
      •  
      •  
      •  
      •  
      •  
      •  
      •  
      •  
      •  
      •  
    • If you submit your contact details, Annette Brooke MP, the Liberal Democrats, and their elected representatives may use the information you provide to contact you about issues you may find of interest. Some of the contacts may be automated. You can opt out of these contacts at any time by contacting us.


    • Generate different image
  • Tell us what you think

    Send us your views

    If you are a resident of the constituency and are writing to discuss any issue that Parliament or government is responsible for, you must provide your home address as MPs are generally only permitted to act on behalf of constituents.

    If you are not a constituent, you do not need to provide your address, but the matters we can deal with are more limited and you may wish to contact your local MP in the first instance.

    • If you agree, Annette Brooke MP, the Liberal Democrats, and their elected representatives may use the information you provide to contact you about issues you may find of interest. Some of the contacts may be automated. You can opt out of these contacts at any time by contacting us.


    • Generate different image